Advertisement
Home
By the Way
"Do No Harm" Video Produced by Canada Silent No More Powerful new video from Denise Mountenay and her organization, Canada Silent No More, highlights and explains the pain, agony and damage caused to women by abortion and the lies and half-truths that perpetuate it. Denise has been working for years to help hurting women come to grips with their past and work together to spare others the pain they have endured. </body> </html>  Details...
Never mind the needle! Try looking for the haystack! by Rod Taylor, Deputy Leader of the CHPreposted from No Apologies I suppose we should be happy whenever a criminal is brought to justice and dark deeds hidden many years are exposed. For those who have suffered a personal loss, especially of a friend or family member, there is some consolation when a perpetrator is identified and held accountable for the misdeeds that have caused so much pain. 18 years ago, Germaine Shawn Lindo disappeared after allegedly immersing a 20-month old infant in scalding water. The child died a month later and Lindo has been on the run ever since. He was arrested Dec 14, 2011 in Connecticut on unrelated charges. Let us hope that the courts move quickly and that—if Lindo is convicted of this heinous crime—sentencing is swift and appropriate. The arrest of a child-killer 18 years after the event is important but one can’t help comparing this to the image of a man looking for “a needle in a haystack”, something most would agree is nearly impossible; but would we not hope that those hunting for child-killers could at least locate the haystack? Perhaps a more telling analogy would be “straining at a gnat and swallowing a camel”. While police forces, courts, journalists and community leaders are joined in their condemnation of this man’s ruthless act, many of them seem not to have noticed a few other child-killers who have been flaunting their activities in broad daylight. I speak of the leaders and financial beneficiaries of the abortion industry. Henry Morgentaler, the de facto “pioneer” of this tax-funded killing spree has moral culpability, or personal guilt for the deaths of over 3.3 million unborn children in Canada alone. I don’t know how many of them he killed with his own hands, but certainly thousands. He has been actively plying his grisly trade since at least 1973, 20 years before Lindo allegedly forced his step-daughter down into the scalding water. Yet Morgentaler has not had to hide. Morgentaler has been feted, celebrated and honoured. He has made a pile of money on his multiple killings. I remember hearing years ago that “…the mountie always gets his man.” Apparently that is no longer true and partly because “the courts always release him.” Morgentaler put his personal agenda against Canada’s moral law and won…at least for a time. Neither courts, parliaments nor mass media have had the moral courage to identify this scoundrel and hold him accountable for his crimes against humanity. Let’s agree together that the detention, trial and sentencing of a wicked man is a good thing, that it is a necessary part of a just and civilized society, one that is able to tell right from wrong. And let’s demand that those charged with protecting innocent human life, those who spent 18 years looking for a needle, turn their attention to the oh-so-obvious haystack, the audacious destroyers in our midst parading as “human rights activists”. Morgentaler and all who engage in his bloody business should be brought to trial, not only for murdering innocents but for the violence they have done to our nation’s innocence.   Details...
Conception to Birth &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Alexander Tsiaras TED talk and visual presentation&lt;br /&gt; &lt;/body&gt; &lt;/html&gt;  Details...
Missing Persons by Vicki Gunn — Executive Director, CHP Canada We hear nightly on the news about the pending global meltdown. Sometimes it’s worth looking back to see where the problem originated so we can ensure that, once dealt with, we avoid similar traps. CHP Canada often links abortion to a source of the problems visited on the world today. Is there a real connection? Could protection for innocent human life have changed where we are today, both in Canada and worldwide? What would happen if the 500+ million people, who have died by abortion worldwide, were part of today’s workforce? What about the 2 million Canadians missing from the workforce? When we look at the effect in Canada then we can simply compound this to consider the ramifications of world-wide abortion. When I think back 40 years, the normal expectation was for Dad to go out to work while Mum stayed home and raised the children. She may or may not have a part-time job when all the children were in school. But, her salary was not assumed as needed to keep the home going. Mum’s salary was ‘gravy’. Dad’s salary was taken into account when they applied for credit. To borrow money, the payments could not be more than Âź of his salary… one week was for the mortgage and three weeks were to cover the rest of the household expenses. As women increasingly entered the workforce and fought for their salaries to be fully included as family income, our Gross Domestic Product (GDP) was positively affected. More workers meant a higher standard of living. But the cold realities of life were: - Women bear children and this necessitates additional expenses to the business, both during the pregnancy and after the child is born in lost hours of work. - Women enjoy working at a job that is not continuous, monotonous routine. We cleaned house yesterday and today it needs cleaning again. We did laundry yesterday and today the laundry pile is sufficient for more laundry. We made meals today and tomorrow the meals will need to be made to feed our families again. All this monotony and no financial gain! - This can’t compare to going to work, completing today’s tasks, and having new tasks tomorrow, all the while collecting a pay cheque at the end of the week. Although, eventually most jobs fall into routine. - I still remember the sentence, “I’m just a housewife”. (“Lowly me, I spend my time cooking, cleaning and raising children.”)  If only we weren’t tied to reproduction then we could also be fulfilled in the workforce. And so, with access to abortion, for the first time, women were able to compete for jobs that were traditionally male dominated. Society only needed only to convince us that the child a woman carries was not a person. While that has been done on a conscious level to many women unfortunately, in our hearts, women still know the truth. But the damage caused to women is for another day; see “Silent No More” for help with this. The impact on our economy was initially a positive one. Canada flourished with women also in the workforce creating employment. But, at what cost? Our birth rate declined… and declined, until Canada dropped below replacement level. The initial influx of women to the workforce leveled off. We hit a plateau for growth. We began to rely on immigration to increase our population to allow growth in the workforce. This solution has produced challenges of its own. - With the decline in birthrate in all Western countries, we needed to go outside of our western worldview of freedom and equality and give ever increasing immigration to world views that do not support our traditional equalities and freedoms… but that’s for another day. See our Immigration Policy for more help with understanding this. - With immigrant families seeking to reunite, we brought in large numbers of older people, which put a strain on our government pension plans as older immigrants don’t spend a working lifetime giving into the plan. - Children are great consumers. They grow and regularly need new clothes, shoes, toys etc. When they are active then they are very hard on clothes, further boosting the consumer need to move the economy. With less children being born live, we are faced with the ‘baby boomer bubble’ with focus turning from a dwindling market to an increasing market…. seniors. But, seniors consume less per capita. Even McDonalds has recognized the changing demographics in Canada by removing their child focused play rooms and replacing them with senior focused sitting areas. - Young people in the past filled the need for casual labour; helping with farming jobs, etc. Today, farmers are unable to fill these positions so they bring in labour from other countries. This earned income, while ensuring the products make it to the stores, is money earned in Canada but spent in other countries, further decreasing our financial position. - I would be remiss if I didn’t mention the economic cost of roughly $500 per abortion procedure to taxpayers, not including the physical and mental costs of post-abortive women. That’s an ‘upfront’ cost of $50 million annually. The yearly loss of over 100,000 Canadian babies by abortion, with readily available birth control, has; caused our birthrate to drop below replacement; increased immigration of near retirees to reunite immigrant families; created a dwindling need for children’s articles; and the need to bring in labour, which does not have a positive effect on our GDP. Combined, these have had a catastrophic effect on our economy, for which our children and grandchildren will spend their lives paying the price. There are many factors that affect our economic climate but the serious effects of abortion have been felt, and will continue to be felt economically, for generations to come. This fact is indisputable, but will we make the needed changes to preserve our freedom and equalities? Only time will tell but…. with increased understanding of the far reaching economic effects of abortion, we can hope and pray that “The sun will come out tomorrow” for Canadian and worldwide economies.   Details...
Catholic Health Care in Jeopardy by Steven W. Mosher, President of the Population Research Institute. As Obamacare gradually chokes out private health care in this country, the nation’s Catholic bishops seem surprised to find themselves more and more on the defensive. But the danger signs were obvious. And the solution is repeal.Evidence continues to pile up that the huge expansion of government formally known as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) — Obamacare, for short — poses huge risks to religious freedom, to the rights of conscience, and to our very lives. Health and Human Services recently issued a directive dealing with so-called “preventive services for women” that are required to be covered under Obamacare. This reads like a Planned Parenthood wish list which, given HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius’ close ties to the abortion industry, is what it may in fact be. The Sebelius directive starts off by mandating that all private insurance plans must pay 100 percent of the cost of all FDA-approved birth control (including abortion-causing devices and drugs like the IUD, ‘morning-after’ pills, and the drug Ella) along with surgical sterilization. The insurers are forbidden to charge the users of these deadly practices a co-pay, meaning that everyone who has health insurance will be collectively bearing the cost. (That includes you, since — in case you’ve forgotten — it is illegal under Obamacare not to buy health insurance.) But Sebelius, who has been reprimanded by her bishop for advocating abortion, is not done with you yet. All insurers, her directive states, must also cover 100 percent of the cost of promoting early-term abortions, sterilizations, and contraception among all “women of reproductive capacity” through “education and counseling.” In other words, she not only insists that you and I pay for immoral acts, she wants you and I to pay for the cost of convincing women to engage in them as well. Now that is hubris. READ MORE   Details...
Lia Tackles Euthanasia </body> </html>  Details...
Saving some is not a compromise The case for advancing abortion legislation in Canada one step at a time*by Mark Penninga, executive director of ARPA Canada (www.ARPACanada.ca) Read the whole article at Reformed PerspectiveWhy is it that this year alone over 80 laws have been passed in the United States restricting abortion and yet in Canada we have not been able to pass one law in over 20 years?It is easy to dish out the blame: It’s our secular society! The Supreme Court! Our gutless politicians! Pierre Trudeau! Stephen Harper! The evil mainstream media! … and so on. But an honest analysis will reveal that at least part of the problem lies with us – the pro-life movement in Canada. That’s a statement liable to raise both eyebrows and blood pressure, but it is also a truth that is verified time and time again by those who are most intimately involved in this battle, including MPs, pro-life leaders, and even radical pro-abortion activists. It is also something that more people are finding the courage to openly admit, knowing full well they will be challenged for it by the pro-life community itself....Read the whole article at Reformed Perspective*Ed. note: Not all prolifers will agree with the every point here presented but all prolifers should read this excellent article and think through the complex issues Mr. Penninga has so aptly addressed. These are the kinds of analyses that we in the prolife community owe to ourselves and to the unborn that we are seeking to represent.   Details...
Shattering Arguments: The Myths of Overpopulation, Grey Tsunami, & Survival of the Fittest  by Elaine Taylor, CHP Member, proprietress of Hero's Lighthouse bookstore in Smithers, BC and wife of Deputy Leader, Rod TaylorThis article was first published in 2 parts as CHP Communiques #43 and #44Part 1How can you say there are too many children? That is like saying there are too many flowers! – M. Teresa   Normal 0 false false false EN-CA X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0cm; mso-para-margin-right:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0cm; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} Normal 0 false false false EN-CA X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0cm; mso-para-margin-right:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0cm; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} Without minimizing the complexity of the issue, it is hoped this article might zero-in on some basics, in order to help equip those who are on information-overload and unable to process all aspects of the many battles we’re forced to engage in or endure. Neither is it a generalisation of the failings of anyone involved in either policy-making or front-line health care. It is a warning to Canadians that only with vigilance can we resist this downhill moral slide.    “Canada’s long history of stable democracy and respect for human rights did not happen in a vacuum. They are a result of a Christian ethos,” as Michael Wagner explains in his Christian Citizenship Guide. Our lack of understanding of this principle has brought us this far down the “slippery slope” we were warned about by many watchmen like Francis Schaeffer, Joe Borowski, Bernard Nathanson, Heather Stilwell, Mother Teresa, Paul de Parrie, Dr. Carol Everett, Keith Green, Wm. Wilberforce, Randall Terry, Ron Gray, Linda Gibbons, Mary Wagoner, Chuck Colson, Denise Mountenay, and the women of Silent No More, to mention just a few.    Right-to-die proponents continue to try to convince the public and the courts that the laws against helping another person die should be overturned. Never mind, fellow Christian, that those laws against certain acts or omissions deemed criminal acts are based on biblical law, hashed through due process by elected representatives. As with abortion and same sex “marriage,” the courts seem to feel they have a right to bypass the democratic process, and until they are reminded of their rightful role, they will continue to push their weight to engineer the brave new world that is their vision-by-revision.   Media continue to mouth platitudes that paint a compassionate picture of medical murder and suicide, and their indoctrination is effective. The guilt most people now feel at the idea of a loved one suffering through what might be their last days is sufficient to move them to justify what used to be unthinkable: the murder of another human being. But this guilt is born of ignorance of the progress that has been made in pain management, and those who understand that society’s conclusions are wrong—and deadly—must learn how to counter the ‘newspeak’ in any conversation of which they are a part.    In most polls and interviews, there are certain assumptions inherent in the very questions that are asked. Read between the lines. Every journalist, news writer, interviewer and pollster has a corporate agenda or his or her own spin on an issue. The rhetoric surrounding the so-called right-to-die issue has gradually seeped like sewage into the craws of the mindless masses, whence it is regurgitated in classrooms, over coffee, and within health-care administration. The resulting attitude will inevitably be the untimely demise of the vulnerable, namely, the costly, the unproductive, the voiceless, and the inconvenient. Sound familiar?   Various cases have exemplified the determination of right-to-die groups to accomplish their agenda by using terminally ill people who have said they want control over the circumstances of their death, and by using some in the medical profession who try to establish their ‘right’ to determine when and how a patient should die, overruling even power of attorney and parental wishes. This is our reality now, in 2011.   Sooner or later you, too, will be faced with the terrible reality that someone wants you or a loved one dead. If you understand the importance of keeping abreast of these issues, here are a few links to organisations that exist to educate and equip us: Lifesite News; Wesley J Smith; and Priests for Life. Internet users would appreciate Alex Schadenberg’s blog, Alex heads up the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition, educating, intervening in specific cases, and co-ordinating efforts to counter this culture of death. Other helpful links are posted on the CHP website.   Christian Heritage Party policies state that: “human life...is sacred from conception and has God-given value, regardless of race, age, gender, or physical or mental handicap.” The value of human life is apparent in our deepest human thoughts. When one child is lost, hundreds of people show up to search because that one child has value. CHP Canada recognises the value of each and every life...this is reflected in our policies. “No person, institution, or government shall tolerate, encourage, or decree death by means such as abortion, euthanasia, or suicide.   Join your voice with Canada’s only pro-life, pro-family federal political party and endorse the value of life.    In Part 2 we will examine some of the subtle but popular utilitarian rhetoric that attempts to justify the direction currently being taken in several end-of-life areas. We’ll get some answers to the frequent question, “Why haven’t I heard this?” It is essential that we fully grasp and expose the implications of every medical and judicial initiative, while doing all we can to restore to this navel-gazing society the true value of each human being, for we are fearfully and wonderfully made!  Part 2How many stars are there in the heavens? Too many? Or too many to count? Genesis 15:5   It is said that if a lie is repeated often enough it will eventually be accepted as truth. We have heard so many lies, and they just get to sound so, well, so normal.  Who lies to us in the respectful silence of our apathy? The feminist movement and the Darwinian social engineers, who wormed their way into your living room via the CBC and its ilk, and into your children’s lives through public (and even sometimes private) education, through libraries, and even cartoons, have succeeded in indoctrinating, mostly with your own hard-earned taxes, two generations of Canadians. Even most Christians barely know up from down any more. Whether by our own rebellion, or the unconscious abrogation of responsibility by parents, ears have been tickled, and popular opinion is now the new ‘truth.’ Vox populi vox dei.  In our naivetĂŠ we now just carry on, blinded by busyness, hoping for the best, claiming there is nothing we can do, while 110,000 potential taxpaying Canadians, wonderfully made in the image of God, are eliminated in the womb, and their great grandparents languish in minimum care facilities, victims of budgets and societal attitudes, awaiting their final sentence, when the legalization of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide will end the great pretense—and the ‘grey tsunami’—CBC’s cleverly derogatory term for the aging Baby Boomers.  All this is not to say Christians are consciously complicit in our moral slide, but only that if we do not know what to believe, how can we stand up against what is wrong? If we can’t see the slide into this culture of death, if we don’t even know that we don’t know, how can we stop the evil around us? We are more often guilty of ignorance, rather than bad intentions, but we can still be part of the problem. Part 1, last week, listed some valuable sources of information to help you become an articulate voice for truth and life. Use them, please.  CHP’s message of life is censored by secular media and toned down or ignored by most Christian publications; our church leaders shrink from bold leadership, often not clearly understanding that there are some things they may still do and say without endangering their precious tax status; and our secular education system at all levels defines its one-sidedness as tolerance and religious neutrality, while our Judeo/Christian worldview is narrow, negative bigotry. We must continue to bring these issues into the light, push back the darkness, and try to regain some clear thinking. We can’t count on church, media or schools to do it. Few papers will now accept paid advertisements with a politically incorrect message. We must become bolder and more articulate, for the freedom to speak the truth, except in private conversation, is quietly disappearing.  Did you know there have again been rumblings federally about legislating presumed consent, which is but another justification for killing those who, due to incapacitation, are re-evaluated according to the sum of their body parts? This was attempted, unsuccessfully, in the Ontario Legislature a few years ago. Presumed consent is in effect in some countries and simply means if one does not carry instructions that one does not want to be an organ donor, one’s consent to be harvested will be presumed, should one be seriously injured in an accident, experience a major heart attack, or other misfortune.  For years now, pressure has been exerted on families in crisis to agree with the apparent futility of treatment for their loved one and to allow the harvesting of that one’s organs. And the conveniently ever-changing definition of death provides ever-more body parts and reduces the costly prospect of long recoveries and permanent disabilities. We have seen the amazing hand of God restore ‘brain-damaged’ patients where parents or spouses have tenaciously held onto hope and protected them from an untimely end. The ethics of the sensitive issue of organ donation deserves much more study than is generally happening among Christians, leaving most unprepared to deal with such an urgent situation in the ER. Emotive ads by the pro-organ donor camp, intimidation or guilt-trips by doctors, and media opinions put forth as status quo, do not ensure our ability to make informed decisions.  Death is inevitable, but murder is unconscionable. Christians must be careful to not justify what might be untimely death using the ‘God-is-in-control’ argument, or some rendition of ‘it must have been his time,’ or, ‘she never would have wanted to live as a disabled person.’ Taken to its logical conclusion, we can then justify murder of any sort, and death by a drunk driver, a worn-out caregiver, a suicide clinic, or an abortionist becomes just God’s way of taking someone home. Even, ‘he’s better off where he is now,’ while it may be true in a sense, can easily slide into a justification for helping him get there.  CHP is committed in its unalterable principles to protecting the first human right—the right to life—without which no other rights have any meaning. Think about these things. Discuss them. Join and support the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition. Use their resources. And support the only federal party whose worldview doesn’t change with every wind of popular opinion—CHP Canada.   Details...
Maurice Vellacott press release The Dupes of Hazard Reruns - International Planned Parenthood‟s Weasel Words, Dishonesty, Deceit and DeathFor Immediate Release September 30, 2011OTTAWA – Member of Parliament Maurice Vellacott commented today on IPPF‟s deceitful language on abortion to con the Canadian government for taxpayer dollars under the Muskoka Maternal/Child Health initiative. IPPF had revised and resubmitted its funding proposal to CIDA after the 2011 election.“The IPPF is trying to dupe us into believing that because Canadian taxpayer dollars are going to countries where abortion is supposedly illegal, the money won‟t be spent on abortions,” says Vellacott. “But we know in Bangladesh, for example, where Canada is funding, this nefarious organization will do early abortion which they euphemistically call „menstrual regulation‟ by vacuum suction. If a woman hasn‟t had her period in 8 weeks, they will do a „menstrual regulation‟ – that‟s an early abortion by another name. “In this way, IPPF will be using Canadian taxpayer dollars for funding abortions directly or, to use other deceptive language, they will be „establishing non-pregnancy in the first trimester.‟“So funding IPPF in these 5 countries contradicts a criterion for Prime Minister‟s Stephen Harper‟s noble initiative to save the lives of women and children in developing countries.....Read the entire press release at Maurice's websiteRead MP Brad Trost's response to the new abortion funding   Details...
Conservatives Resume Planned Parenthood Funding by Rod Taylor, Deputy Leader of the CHP “Buddy, can you spare $6 million? I won’t use it to buy liquor, honest….” Chances are, you’ve been asked—at least once in your life—to “…help a guy out. I’m hungry. No, I won’t buy a bottle; I just want a sandwich. I haven’t eaten for days.” When the unhappy person standing before you reeks of alcohol, it’s easy to presume one or two things: • This person recently had enough money to purchase alcohol in some form. • This person may be unemployed or unemployable due to excessive consumption of alcohol, perhaps on a regular basis. • This person may be seeking money for the purpose of purchasing more alcohol. • This person may be self-deceived and unwilling or unable to be brutally honest about his or her aspirations, eagerness to change or to seek employment. Regardless of the specific circumstances and the moral angst many of us may feel at such a time (wanting to help but not wanting to enable more self-destructive behaviour) any rational person can quickly reason this way: assuming that the penniless person asking for help is genuinely hungry and not just, well, thirsty…any loonies, toonies, quarters or dimes we may give—even if used only for food—allow that person to devote any other funds that may be acquired to the purchase of drink or drugs. That means that “compartmentalizing” our personal charity in no way reduces the likelihood that the individual in question will continue to pursue destructive personal choices. Even buying a meal for such a person—while funnelling our little contribution into “food”—enables the reallocation of any other resources to the purchase of enslaving substances which tend to keep the person self-deceived, unemployable and dependent on the good will of others. Now about that $6 million…International Cooperation Minister Bev Oda is at it again and her Conservative Party leader, the Rt. Hon. Stephen Harper is giving her leeway to pander to the radical feministas at Planned Parenthood. Their funding ( $6 million over 3 years) has been restored as long as they “don’t use if for abortions”. Life lesson alert for the Conservatives: if you give Planned Parenthood $6 million it will help them promote their worldwide agenda of abortion, contraception and the early sexualisation of children who later become their clients. Planned Parenthood is the biggest abortion provider in the world. They are smart enough to take money from the Canadian government, put it into an account called “non-abortion” and move other funds into their “abortion” accounts. In short, they are philosophically abortion –oriented. Everything they do supports abortion and access to abortion. If we help them print a brochure, we are helping them provide abortions. If we fly their staff to a meeting in Tanzania (where abortions are illegal), we are helping them provide abortions in India where they are not. We wouldn’t fund the mafia if they wanted to host a “Children’s Day” would we? Even with assurances that none of the money would be used to commit crime? We wouldn’t fund a KKK rally in Cincinnati if they promised to avoid mentioning racial issues at that event would we? Giving money to an abortion provider who promises (wink! wink!) to not use the money for abortions is no more credible. It’s time we held this government to a higher standard. The games played around this issue are not only hypocritical and deceptive but they insult the intelligence of Canadians. ANY money given to Planned Parenthood will contribute to the annual slaughter of the unborn around the world. If that’s what the Conservatives want, they should be honest and tell prolife Canadians that they are not and never will be prolife. They support abortion and abortion providers. If, however, they desire to actually protect innocent human life with their long-awaited majority, they should remove Bev Oda from her position, rescind this duplicitous grant to the largest baby-killing organization in the world and take their place in history. I’m not holding my breath but I’m willing to be surprised…   Details...
Search
Events Calendar
< January >
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31 1 2 3 4


Twitter This!
Climate Change Info
Global Warming Petition Project (Over 31,000 scientists have signed as of June 2008)

Global Warming Doomsday Called Off---CBC Documentary

Ontario Government Distributes Al Gore Climate Change Film to Schools

"Deniers" Series Exposes Poor Science Behind Global Warming

Abortion Linked to Climate Change
"Do No Harm" Video Produced by Canada Silent No More
Powerful new video from Denise Mountenay and her organization, Canada Silent No More, highlights and explains the pain, agony and damage caused to women by abortion and the lies and half-truths that perpetuate it. Denise has been working for years to help hurting women come to grips with their past and work together to spare others the pain they have endured.
 
MP Pension Rip-off Will Cost Taxpayers at Least $277 Million
Canadian Taxpayers' Federation Exposes New Revelation re. the "gold-plated" MP's Pensions...Now calls them "Platinum-Plated"

39 MPs elected in 2006 qualify for $30.9 million lifetime payout on January 23, 2012. Taxpayers contribute $248,668 per year to each MPs pension, while MPs contribute as little as $10,990 per year.

Read the entire story at the Canadian Taxpayers Federation website.


 
Run-on Sentencing: BC Court Delays Make a Mockery of Justice System

by Rod Taylor, Deputy Leader of the CHP

 

first posted at No Apologies

When things go out of control or are in short supply, long line-ups, frustration and disappointment cannot be far behind. When that which is out of control is that which is meant to restrain anarchy and retain civility, those line-ups can disintegrate into mobs and that frustration can boil over into lawlessness.

The court system in Canada is out of control and justice is in short supply. Canadians have come to expect legitimate grievances to go unresolved and heinous crimes to go unpunished. No upright citizen can feel satisfied with such a state of affairs but the bloated system crawls along and those inured to its shortcomings lament the obstinate and obvious spread of apathy and mistrust.

Take, for example, some statistics from BC. I have no doubt that the other provinces are in a similar dysfunctional state of affairs. CBC recently reported that there are at least 2,500 criminal cases in BC that have been before the courts for 18 months or more. A 2-day criminal trial will now take an average of 11.2 months to work its way through the courts. Not days, months! Judges simply gave up on 109 cases last year, staying charges rather than keep victims and accused in perpetual suspense.

My favourite statement of historical and sociological truth on this situation comes from Solomon, one of the wisest men who ever lived: “Because punishment is not administered promptly, men’s hearts become even more wicked”. Simply put, if there are no appropriate consequences and if they are not felt soon after the commission of a crime, men will continue to do worse things, expecting no retribution.

Of course, changes to our judicial system are difficult. We didn’t get here overnight. Precedent and complicated judgments arising out of sometimes convoluted interpretations of Charter rights have given rise to unreasonable expectations and a harmful focus on the rights of the accused over the rights of law-abiding citizens to enjoy safe streets, homes and schools.

However, if we are ever going to clear the backlog, institute meaningful deterrence and raise the level of citizen accountability, we will have to take steps to eliminate ridiculous excuses and painful and expensive delays.

Let’s assume for a minute that most policemen are trying to do their jobs and trying to protect the citizens in their communities. We need to thank them for it. But there are some bad cops out there and they should be brought to justice quickly, sentenced or acquitted like anyone else. I appreciate the work policemen do. But if they (or anyone) is accused of violating the trust of Canadians, exploiting their positions of authority, using gratuitous violence, then they should be suspended WITHOUT PAY, until their guilt or innocence can be established. This should not be a matter of years; perhaps a couple of months. If acquitted, they should get backpay with a modest compensation package for wrongful incarceration (perhaps twice their regular payrate and a paid ad in every provincial newspaper exonerating them. If convicted, they should be stripped of any honours and fired with no chance of return. This goes for politicians, CEOs, high-level bureaucrats, union bosses, teachers and all in any position of authority. Case in point: five police officers in Toronto are just now “going on trial” for charges dating back to 2003 and before. Their investigation alone has cost taxpayers $14 million (!) yet a couple of these men have been on “paid leave” for 4 to 8 years or more!!! This is disgusting and inexcusable.

Let’s get beyond the idea that we have to let people out on bail. Why? If they did something worthy of jail time, they should be in jail, not running around the country. Bail gives rich people an advantage over the poor who can’t afford bail. Again, if they’re found innocent, pay them twice their wage for time behind bars and make sure employers can’t fire them for being “unavailable for work”—until and unless they are convicted. But don’t postpone and delay their case for months or years. If they’re arrested on a Friday, they should be in court by the next Wednesday. Gather the evidence, call up a jury and deal with the evidence.

No probation or early release for violent offenders. If ANY criminal misbehaves while on parole / probation, the probation officer takes his place in jail until he’s recaptured (up to a maximum of two years). Once recaptured, double the sentence with NO parole.

And of course, we need to immediately throw out the twisted thinking that overlooks violent crime if the perpetrator can be proven insane. The wretched shell of a man in BC who murdered his three children, leaving their bodies for his wife to discover was given two years and is now eligible for parole. Come on! You can’t make this stuff up. The only people crazier than some of these violent criminals are the people who want to release them back into society.

There also need to be some reasonable time limits on court cases themselves—the time actually spent in court. How long does it take to review the actual evidence from a murder scene and to interview the witnesses? For all but the most complicated multiple murders, why should it take more than a week? Shoplifting? Maybe an hour or two to hear witnesses and examine the evidence.

No more casual postponement of court dates. Lawyers who can’t show up (without a doctor’s note or a cancelled flight documents) will pay the court costs for rescheduling. The accused will be there because he / she will be brought from the jail cell. If the prosecution doesn’t have its evidence and witnesses lined up and loses the case they should have won…oh well, prisoner goes free. Prosecutor gets a negative review. If there is a consistently shabby performance, prosecuting attorney is fired, tries to find work as a private lawyer.

Does all this sound simplistic or harsh? Guess what? The judicial system is supposed to administer JUSTICE and protect society. We need more common sense and less wasting of time with proceedings and judgments that fail to punish the wicked and protect the just.

Join me in calling this nation back to a realistic framework for our courts. We will not only protect the innocent from crimes against them but we will help steer young people away from a life of crime, blaming the system and failing to make good choices for a productive and happy life. We owe them a just land and just laws. Our current system is a disgrace.

 
It Is What It Is: the New “Whatever”

“It is what it is,” (IIWII). I’ve heard this a lot, lately. It likely originated with some “reality” show. I think I’m starting to get it and I don’t like it. There’s a place for resignation, and a place for vision; but IIWII just affirms Canadians’ predisposition to apathy. No, I don’t like it.

You see, folks still ask why on earth we need a conservative political party with a Christian bent that has never won anything yet, when we have a “conservative” party without a Christian bent that now has a majority. It is what it is. Let it be.

So why does the CHP exist? Well, 25 years ago some folks weren’t resigned to the “it is what it is” of Canadian politics. And thousands remain un-resigned. “It” was democracy by the choice of the “lesser of two evils.” Amply represented were the viewpoints of secularism, relativism, and socialism, while the increasingly politically-incorrect values of absolute truth, national sovereignty, sanctity of life, personal responsibility, and a do-unto-others standard of morality were inexorably eroded by a society that had cut its teeth on the humanistic propaganda of media and public education. It is what it is? Not for the CHP.

We shake our heads in disbelief when we see a country such as Cuba, Zimbabwe, Pakistan, or Egypt holding so-called democratic elections, where there is only one “candidate” to vote for, or where there are two dictators to choose from, or where we know every woman’s vote has been coerced and every man’s bought. Yet many delude themselves that voting for the lesser of two or three or four evils (secular, humanistic-based parties) in our land still says we are exercising a democratic right and duty—and treat the CHP, the only party standing for absolutes, as a non-entity, a sure loser!

Who was this oft-quoted fellow who said, “of two evils, choose neither,” and, “all that is necessary for evil to flourish is that good men do nothing”? This Edmund Burke was certainly not an it-is-what-it-is kind of guy. Is this too scary a thought? Do we fear the flak? Do we feel like Moses, not competent to answer our critics? Do we fear our clients might jump ship, our customers shop elsewhere, our family be embarrassed, or our buddies sort of just “forget” to call us for that weekend outing?

It is what it is? This sounds so fatalistic! Since when in history have Christians been the ones to just accept the status quo? We see people’s need for the salvation of Jesus Christ, and long for justice, freedom, peace, and protection. It is this gospel, the essential truth of God’s hand in the affairs of men, that has brought hope to a world otherwise in despair. Without that, ultimately, who cares? Why care about anything? It just “is what it is.” Man is a purposeless automaton in a cosmos as irrelevant as he has tried to make its Creator. But no! Good men made good laws in better times, to promote and protect the open hands and unlocked doors that attest to those laws’ validity.

And we do care, as evidenced by this conversation; borne out by the fact that we do vote; obvious from our passion in the discussion. Integrity demands that no area of one’s life be unaffected by one’s belief in the truth of who Jesus is. Anything else is at best spiritual immaturity, and at worst, hypocrisy. Let God continue to transform you by changing the way you think, (Romans 12).

The other “alternative” party that began in the same era as the CHP sacrificed its ideals to popular opinion and now rules without them. We in the CHP reject the fatalism that says we can never win: neither “it” nor we are what we shall be, as long as God rules! Wasted vote? Lesser of evils? How can anyone lose by standing for truth, life, and freedom? How can we win if we abandon them to IIWII? Who would trade the heritage of freedom blood-bought for the creeping chains of status quo? Without the CHP there is no party to represent the ideals that my grandmother’s hero expressed so well—ideals his party abandoned, but which we would do well to emulate:

“I am a Canadian,
free to speak without fear,
free to worship in my own way,
free to stand for what I think right,
free to oppose what I believe wrong, or
free to choose those who shall govern my country.
This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” – John G. Diefenbaker (1895-1979) Prime Minister of Canada.
Paraphrasing the Canadian Bill of Rights, July 1, 1960.

 
Which Came First: the Building or the Heritage?

by Rod Taylor, Deputy Leader of the CHP

I’m a sentimental guy and I think more people should be. When I worked on the CNR for six years, maintaining track and roadbed in Alberta’s Mountain Region so that the trains could run on time, I felt like I was sharing in Canada’s history. When I was assigned for a summer to the double-tracking project in Jasper National Park, I couldn’t help but feel a connection to the pioneers of old and the Chinese labourers who helped blast the first roadbed and lay the first track through Canada’s pristine wilderness. For over 20 years I worked in BC’s lumber mills and I also enjoyed being a part of that historically-significant industry; the economic benefit that all British Columbians have received from the harvest and processing of our forest resources needs to be remembered by generations yet unborn. Likewise the contributions of Canada’s farmers, miners, fishermen and those who drilled our first oil and gas wells.

Of course, Canada’s First Peoples discovered and depended upon some of this land’s incredibly rich natural resources long before the tide of Europeans arrived and the interactions between them and the fur traders define much of Canada’s cultural character today. The rich heritage we have received from all of these folks—their deeds, their words, their artifacts—should be treasured and passed on to succeeding generations of Canadians. There are more groups who need be honoured as well: the war dead—those who were buried overseas and those who returned to live out their lives on home soil, the business entrepreneurs, the immigrant groups, journalists and on and on…

There is an aspect of this appreciation of heritage, however, that can become idolatrous if separated from its roots. CBC recently shone the spotlight on various “heritage buildings” which have either been torn down or destroyed by fire or which will succumb in time to the pressures of developers, shifting land values and shifting priorities. Indeed, some grand old buildings which have played a crucial part in Canada’s history and development are gone and “will never more be seen”. Vancouver’s Pantages Theatre, Toronto’s old Empress Hotel and various aircraft hangars used during the construction of fighter planes during WWII are among those listed as going, going, gone. While this is sad for a sentimental fellow like me, I’d like to look at this situation with a perspective focused on our “heritage”, what that means, how “values” determine “value” and how our loyalties can become misplaced.

Canada stands today—among the nations of the world—as a nation with a reputation for decency, opportunity, freedom and respect. The sacrifices made by Canadians in WWII resulted in the liberation of peoples across the water and the unraveling of Hitler’s plan to dominate the world. Our education, healthcare and system of parliamentary democracy have been, until recently, the envy of the world. Our growth and ability to supply food and energy for ourselves and those beyond our borders (and our willingness to do so) have made a huge difference in the world and continue to do so. Our personal freedoms—of speech, conscience, religion, assembly—have been a beacon of hope for folks in many lands. These freedoms and attributes and contributions to mankind are truly the heritage that we need to preserve and honour. All of them emanate, directly or indirectly, from our Judeo-Christian worldview. Our justice system is based on English common law and the Magna Carta, which in turn came about through the application of biblical principles of equality to social structures and interaction. Our first public schools and colleges were started by Christians as were many of our first hospitals and charitable organizations. The work ethic itself, the shared expectations of honesty and the respect for the property of others, the protection of the rights of minorities and of the vulnerable—all of these come from a common root: a biblical worldview that sees mankind as stewards, dependent on and responsible to the Creator God, here on this earth by His gracious design. That worldview postulates that we are the beneficiaries of the hard work and sacrifices of those who came before us as well as the willing sacrifice made for us at Calvary; it tells us that we have responsibilities, first to our Maker and also to those who come after us and that our reward for living in obedience to godly precepts is primarily in the world to come.

These concepts are the heritage that we must work to preserve and retain. If we can save a building here and there—the buildings with standout architecture or dominion-relevant interest to future generations, we should do so. But if we were to save all the buildings and lose the heritage values, the freedoms, the willingness to sacrifice for others, all we would have left are the empty shells to remind us of a heritage lost. And of course, once the heritage is lost, along with its cultural foundations, we would also lose our prosperity and our ability to maintain and protect the buildings.

All you who love Canadian heritage: step up and take your place among those seeking to defend it! We must defend it in our schools, in our courts, in our parliament and legislative assemblies, in our churches and in our communities. Buildings come and go. History is littered with their time-worn bones. The foundation upon which Canada’s heritage buildings were erected is Canada’s Christian heritage. Let’s preserve that!

 
New Year’s Resolutions
by Jim Hnatiuk

“Should auld acquaintance be forgot,
and never brought to mind ?
Should auld acquaintance be forgot,
and days o' auld lang syne ?” (Robbie Burns 1788)

We’re standing on the brink of a New Year. It always feels to me like a field of fresh fallen snow... nothing has
marked it.... it’s a clean slate to correct the course of the old year.

But we all know that the course we are on is not pristine; it’s marred by the mistakes of last year, and the year
before, and the year before that....

What does that mean for us as Canadians? What does it mean for us as members and friends of CHP Canada?
This New Year’s message comes to you as we look forward as a party but also as a nation, and as individual
Canadians. I’m writing to members of the Christian Heritage Party, and friends of CHP Canada, and also to
Canadians who want to know what CHP Canada offers to Canadians in the New Year.

Last week, I spoke of Domestic Growth vs Immigration http://www.chp.ca/2011/domestic-growth-vsimmigration/
as a way of sustaining our population. The previous week, Vicki Gunn, Executive Director of CHP Canada, spoke
of the financial cost of abortion and its effect on Canada’s culture. http://www.chp.ca/2011/missing-persons/

There is much tying these two topics together. There is also much we must do as CHP members and friends to preserve our culture.

The question may arise as to why we should even make a stand. Why should we put ourselves out to stop a
tsunami of attacks on our culture? It’s not like we can stop the tide, or can we?

When you joined CHP Canada, or first requested to receive our weekly CommuniquĂŠ, you already knew that
something was wrong. You already knew that you needed some information. But, were you looking for
Canadian RCMP hero, Dudley Do-Right, to swoop in with a mighty call, “I’ll save you, Canada!”?

Dudley Do-Right is a cartoon figure. He will not be sweeping in to save the situation. That leaves you and me to
do the job. It means that we have to dig down and find the inner strength to stand against the rising tide that is
engulfing our country and threatening our way of life.

In Canada, we have not experienced a war on our soil in our lifetimes. When called upon, we Canadians have
shown ourselves to be brave when battles have raged on foreign shores. But our limited battle experience since
the days of the Greatest Generation has not prepared us to understand the daily grind of fighting with little
visible progress and even occasional loss of ground.

It took 6 years to end WW2. There were battles lost and battles won. That’s what war is.

In Canada, we have been fighting a battle for over 40 years to save the lives of unborn children and yet have
seen few victories. Does that mean we should surrender and go home? Of course not; we all know that if we
give up on this vital cause more problems will follow. We know that we need to maintain a stable and vibrant
population as discussed in “Domestic Growth vs Immigration.”  http://www.chp.ca/2011/domestic-growthvs-
immigration/
 

We know that our culture of freedom and equality is gradually being reduced to a mere facade
as other ideas take hold such as the subordination of women, government-mandated restrictions on free speech,
denial of personhood to babies not yet born, judge-made laws and definitions of life and human worth,
http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/judge-rules-no-jail-time-for-infanticide-because-canada-accepts-abortion/
 the ending of one’s own life as a right and the decision to end the lives of others based on medical convenience
or misguided notions of “quality of life”.  http://www.chp.ca/2011/doctor-please-kill-me-euthanasia/
Canada is embroiled in a battle. The lines are drawn. On one side, those who believe humans have value
because we are created in the image of God and, on the other side, those whose beliefs about the value of
human life range from “disposable” to “a blight on the planet”. In any battle each one of us needs to be armed.
Who would go into battle without weapons? Our weapons, which of course begin with prayer, require that we
arm ourselves with knowledge. We must know what the effects of the assaults on our culture are; then we
MUST go out and educate others. We must let them know that there is one political party that is in the battle for
life, for culture, and for future generations.

This week, follow the links I’ve given you in this Communiqué; explore these issues until you see the
importance of supporting, with energy, dedication and finances, CHP Canada. Lobby groups serve a useful
purpose, but voter support is the currency of political parties. You don’t shop for groceries in Canada using the
Japanese Yen and you don’t accomplish political change except through voter support for the party whose
ideals you cherish.

Change is accomplished by forcing the mainstream parties to take your concerns seriously. Each one of us
holds a piece of currency in Canadian politics... our vote.

Join the Christian Heritage Party or renew your membership today, and donate to the party today. Be a part of
the team preparing the important ground work that will take us into the next federal election four years from
now. If you and I do not do it, who will? Your work will help thousands more hear about and come to support
CHP Canada.

This is the beginning of 2012. Make it your New Year’s resolution to do your part to help CHP Canada grow
and gain ground, to achieve greater visibility and impact not only in this year but in the years that lie ahead.
I thank you for your membership and support and for your commitment to God, to Canada and to future
generations.

I wish you all a blessed New Year.
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Results 1 - 10 of 684
Map of Skeena-Bulkley
How a Bill Becomes Law
This video tutorial produced by ARPA Canada details the process by which an idea is transformed into a bill and how that bill becomes law.
Most Recent Articles
Recommended Links
CHP YOUTH CAUCUS ACTIVITY
The Skeena-Bulkley Valley CHP Youth were again active this past year trying to support a local housing initiative. Sparrows Christian Housing Society has started building a home in Smithers, designed for independent living for adults who have intellectual disabilities. The youth have been doing various fund raising activities for Sparrows, while at the same time being visibly present in the community during the annual Fall Fair, and taking part in the local parade.





For more information about Sparrows Housing, click HERE

For more about the CHP Skeena-Bulkley Valley Youth Caucus, click HERE

To join or find out more about the SBV Youth, send an email to:
This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it
Syndicate
© 2012 Christian Heritage Party
.