Advertisement
Home
By the Way
BC: HST on Parking Tax - Hosed Again by Maureen Bader    Canadian Taxpayers Federation People have lots reasons to be upset about the Harmonized Sales Tax (HST). For starters, it means the price of many goods and services will be 7 per cent higher. Of course, the government assures us this will only be at first. They claim businesses will pass cost savings along to consumers because they will no longer pay the provincial sales tax (PST) on their business inputs. Many citizens are skeptical about whether businesses will lower prices. However, what citizens should really be skeptical about is whether the prices for services the government provides will go down. So far it seems it will be government, not business, ripping-off consumers.One example is the PST on liquor in restaurants, which will fall from 10 to 7 per cent. Will this mean a price reduction to hard-pressed consumers? No, the government will increase the wholesale mark-up on alcohol to keep its revenue the same. So tipplers will see no savings when the HST arrives -- no harmonization-induced price reduction here, folks.Taxpayers were also supposed to say goodbye to the 7 per cent parking sales tax that goes to TransLink, the Lower Mainland's public transit Leviathan. The government said that tax would be repealed with the implementation of the HST, and "options for TransLink related to the removal of the parking tax are being reviewed."That not only led the naïve observer, but TransLink Chair Dale Parker to muse about what TransLink would do once it no longer had the 7 per cent parking sales tax to count on for revenue.So imagine the shock and awe when the Ministry of Finance announced in December that the PST on parking in TransLink’s region would triple from 7 per cent to 21 per cent. But, wait a minute! Wasn't the PST on parking supposed to be eliminated? Oh no, explained the finance ministry. The PST on parking isn't really a PST (even though it’s covered in the Social Services Tax Act, otherwise known as the PST legislation), it’s a tax collected by the province for TransLink, so it doesn't fall into the PST cuts originally announced, even though they in fact, did announce it. If you are not already a bit befuddled by this, hold on to your wallet. According to federal GST legislation, if a sales tax in B.C. is more than 11 per cent, the 12 per cent HST will be charged on top of it. That means the parking sales tax will not be 21 per cent as originally announced, but 23.52 per cent as of July 1, 2010. Paying HST on a tax? Can you say tax grab? But not only will working stiffs and shoppers trying to park in the Lower Mainland pay HST on the parking sales tax, they will pay HST on parking as well, bumping up the total tax paid on parking to 35.52 per cent! Theory says that consumer prices should go down once the HST is implemented. Experience tells that when government gets involved, prices go up. The government says it is bringing in the HST to lower costs and make the province more competitive for business investment. But forgetting facts when they are no longer convenient and arbitrarily increasing a tax is the mark of a government out of control. The government must stick with original plan and repeal the TransLink parking tax. By: Maureen Bader Posted: January 11, 2010     Details...
FED: Audit Nightmare by Kevin Gaudet Canadian Taxpayers FederationImagine the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) shows up at your door to do an audit.  As if that alone isn’t scary enough, they proceed to take both copies of your documents, originals and photocopies  -- without your permission.  They lose or destroy these key originals. Then they assess hefty tax bills against you because you cannot provide documents in your defense.  CRA mistakenly demands you pay $800,000 in taxes allegedly owed.  This helps ruin your business, leaving you broke. Does this sound far-fetched?  Not according to British Columbia’s Mr. Irvin Leroux, who has lost everything fighting for 14 years against such bully tactics by the CRA.His treatment outraged his MP, the long-serving Dick Harris, who took up his cause with the former Minister of National Revenue. According to Mr. Leroux, his MP was told by the Minister that the CRA couldn’t pro-actively compensate Mr. Leroux for his loss, but that he could sue the government and they would offer a settlement.As ridiculous as it is that Mr. Leroux has been forced to sue the Canadian government to get back some or all of what he has lost in his lengthy tax fight fiasco, not a nickel has been offered. In this case it appears the federal government made a mistake; a big one at that. They should just admit it, apologize for it, and settle out of court with Mr. Leroux. Instead, they are playing the Goliath against his David, fighting him in court and denying any wrong-doing on their part.The latest tactic employed by government lawyers, scheduled for court at the end of this January, has been to argue that Leroux’s lawsuit has no merit as his tax case was resolved earlier.    Details...
FED: Resolutions for 2010: Honesty First by Kevin Gaudet  Canadian Taxpayers FederationAs the end of the year approaches many people take stock of the year that was and make resolutions for the year to come. If politicians did this they first would realize that there is much work to be done. The political year of 2009 in Canada was – yet again – marked too often by hypocrisy and self-interest. Looking forward to 2010 there are many ways which politicians could raise the bar higher. Start with more honesty in politics, focusing on making Canada more prosperous, instead of only worrying about grabbing and holding on to power for its own sake. Here are suggestions for a few of Canada’s political leaders.1. Prime Minister Stephen Harper:Stop worrying about holding on to power for its own sake. Focus more on the basics of providing prosperity through limited government. Provide a clear detailed plan for balancing the budget – preferably over three years.If you don’t believe in man-made global warming, then stop pretending you do. Instead, reject all forms of new carbon taxes like cap-and-tax. If you want to be ‘green’ find policies that won’t break the bank and will provide a cleaner environment in ways all can agree on.2. Opposition Leader Michael Ignatieff:Stop trying to be all things to all people. You can’t both demand stimulus spending, having threatened to topple the government if it didn’t happen, then criticize the deficit that arose from it.Start issuing clear ideas you to which you are committed. You have mused about a new high-speed railway, national daycare, East-West power grid, the Kelowna Accord, and raising the GST. Pick some you believe in and defend them. Better to debate the merits of a controversial plan than to have none at all.Even better still, outflank Mr. Harper with a fiscally prudent agenda.3. Bloc Quebecois Leader Gilles Duceppe:The Bloc Quebecois are honest and clear. They want taxes raised to balance the budget and want Canada torn apart. Take a long hard look at the benefits to Quebec of being in Canada – including the $8 billion a year in Equalization payments. Wind up your party, the goals of which never go higher than draining as much as possible into Quebec from the rest of Canada. The country deserves better; that includes Quebec.4. City MayorsProvincial and federal coffers are bare. Deficits loom for years and debt is piling up. Cities also have been over-spending. This time, though, cash bailouts won’t be on offer from higher levels of government. Mayors should protect local ratepayers from hikes in property taxes, user fess and levies. Now is the time to get back to basics focusing on core city priorities not grandiose ideas that cost billions of dollars.5. All Politicians:Resist calls to balance budgets on the backs on over-burdened taxpayers. The easy path of tax hikes is followed too often. Take the less-trodden road of reducing spending.Focus more on honesty and sincerity. You might be surprised by the benefits that accrue. Canadians may actually like what they hear. If not, we are broad-minded enough to agree-to-disagree with respect.Happy New Year! By: Kevin Gaudet Posted: January 04, 2010   Details...
"The Spin Stops with CHP Canada" by Jim Hnatiuk, National Leader of CHP Canada Yesterday I was challenged with the comment: "If the CHP is really serious about winning .... then let us see some promises that amount to something!" my challenger then went on to give me some sample promises we should consider."Promise to remove the G.S.T. and the Federal government's part of the H.S.T. across the nation and promise a standard of living for all the poor that matches the cost of living in the country."I say, sir, the CHP will do much better than that! We'll instead remove all federal income taxes both personal and corporate, gift, estate, and capital gains, and replace them with one simple, visible, federal retail sales tax! This makes taxation simpler and much more sensible, instead of paying taxes on what you earn; you would pay on what you spend. Now, to ensure that this tax is fair, all taxpayers will receive a monthly subsidy, called a "pre-bate," to offset the tax on bare necessities. So, low-income families would end up paying no taxes at all. The wealthy that buy and spend a lot, would pay a lot. 'Fair Tax' rewards productivity and better protects the very low income earners. Consumption based taxation is widely recognised by economists to be the most equitable form of taxation, hence its name, the 'Fair Tax'.Another promise he suggested we use was to "Raise the Old age pensions and Canada pensions in a method that keeps up with a cost of living and give stay at home mom's Canada pension benefits.Once again, sir, CHP Canada will do much better than that! We'll instead overhaul the broken Canada Pension Plan with a new Personal Income Security Account (PISA). This proven plan will provide a portable investment portfolio, vested in the name of each worker, for health, employment, and retirement income. This proven plan adopted by Chile has shown that those Chilean workers who chose this investment plan are now retiring wealthy -- and Chile has become an economic powerhouse in Latin America because of the pools of investment created.As for the stay-at-home mom, CHP Canada would do much more than just pension benefits. We see the married two-parent family as the most important foundation of society, and as such, deserves protection. CHP Canada's Family Friendly Childcare Allowance would provide $1000 per month to any family where one of the parents chooses to stay home and raise their children-until age 18. Now that's real childcare and true recognition of the importance of the stay-at-home mom.Another of my challenger's suggestion was to: "Bring in a law that will confiscate all assets of those who gain financially through crime, such as swindling by white collar workers, the sale of street drugs, and any other criminal activities in which profit is made."Under the Criminal Code of Canada, the government does have broad powers of seizure, but this is not the full picture of what criminal justice in Canada should accomplish either. The CHP would require criminals to make restitution to the victim, who is all too often forgotten in today's justice system.He said promise to "Make the Senate ..elected positions.." Yes, again, we agree! That is CHP Canada's position.CHP Canada provides Canadians with sound federal political solutions, unfortunately as with this gentleman, most Canadians have yet to find this out. That is where each CHP member comes in, our solutions are not complicated; they only need to be communicated. Let's all work to show Canadians that the Spin stops with CHP Canada! We're not all politically minded but we can all communicate CHP Canada's basic, better solutions. Our national team is always glad to help you present it clearly. Make it your New Year's project to present our better solutions to those who don't know about the CHP.For a more comprehensive read of our platform check out our Better Solutions at www.chp.ca  Details...
BC: 2009 taxes unplugged by Maureen Bader     Canadian Taxpayers Federation There were lots of stories in the news in 2009 about government spending and taxation, but of all the stories, none has more serious long-term consequences than the return to deficit spending. The B.C. government has a spending addiction and is supporting its habit by a massive increase in the provincial debt. If spending is not brought under control, taxpayers will be left with a legacy of higher taxes. B.C.'s across-the-board income tax cuts have created a relatively competitive tax regime, second only to Alberta in Canada. But out-of-control spending is obviously unsustainable. Is the government looking for ways to cut spending? No, it's creating a legacy of debt for future generations and designing automatic stealth tax hikes to feed its spending addiction. The debt is expected to balloon to almost $60 billion by 2013, up from $38 billion in 2008. That means each child born in 2013 will owe the provincial government almost $13,000. Debt servicing costs are expected to rise to $8 million per day by 2011. Sending millions of dollars every day to bondholders to pay the interest on the debt is nothing more than fiscal child abuse. Further, automatic stealth tax hikes build a tax burden on unsuspecting taxpayers and do nothing to help government overcome its spending addiction. The Medical Services Premium (MSP), otherwise known as the health tax, will feed the government's spending addiction by increasing automatically every year. While many British Columbians believe the health tax is an insurance program that pays for health care, nothing could be further than the truth. The health tax is a poll tax -- a per-person tax charging a fixed amount that goes directly into the government’s general revenue pot. Right now, the health tax takes $1.6 billion per year out of taxpayers' pockets and will take a bigger bite in the future -- $1.7 billion in 2010-11 and $1.8 billion in 2011-12. The carbon tax, like the health tax, also increases every year. The government must eliminate these two stealth taxes to start its spending withdrawal program. Without spending reductions, the legacy of debt will be long lasting and lead to lower economic growth. Stealth tax hikes already show the direction B.C. is heading. But government spending-induced economic stagnation and future tax hikes are not inevitable.  Details...
No Christmas Bonus? Over a Measly $15.3 Million? by Rod Taylor   CHP Deputy LeaderHeave a collective sigh of relief. The $15.3 million worth of gold missing from the Royal Canadian Mint has been, er…accounted for! Actually $1.6 million of it has actually been found kind of lying about in the buildings and machinery. We really ought to be a little more thorough when we do our housecleaning.The balance of it---rest assured!---has not been stolen! That's the good news. The bad news is that is still missing…Canadians, however, should take comfort in the knowledge that $8 million worth was only miscounted, not stolen. (I'm not sure whether that means that trustworthy mint employees handling a product worth over $1000 per ounce couldn't count in 2008 and there is more there than earlier reported or whether they couldn't count in 2007 and reported more than there actually was…details, details!) Over the Christmas holidays, I'm sure those employees will be asking their children for tutoring in the basic techniques of counting. If new calculators would help, perhaps some "stimulus" money could be found. It's a shame that we had to involve the RCMP and hire three independent auditing firms to re-establish confidence in the Mint.The other amount that "has not been stolen" is an inconsequential sum (barely worth mentioning) of $3 million that was "accidentally" sold as slag to the US. After all, both slag and pure gold are metallic in nature. You could hardly expect employees of the Royal Canadian Mint to make sure that truckloads of outbound product were correctly stored, labeled and shipped. At any rate, Conservative MP Rob Merrifield, Minister of State for Transport and the minister responsible for the mint, has decided to draw a line in the sand and reset expectations for the mint executives. After expressing "disappointment" at the misplacing, miscounting and misshipment, he has told mint executives they will NOT be receiving a bonus for their performance in 2008. (I used to think a "bonus" was awarded for some exceptional or outstanding dedication or achievement, not for simply doing one's job WITHOUT losing $15.3 million of national resources.)Now some might find Mr. Merrifield's stern rebuke a bit harsh just before Christmas. We all make mistakes don't we? Still others might think it a little soft. After all, with hefty annual salaries and perks, usually there is some accountability for results. In the private sector it wouldn't be unusual for highly-placed executives to find themselves "looking for another job".Then again, when you consider that Mr. Merrifield's government still dishes out $30 million dollars per year to the largest political parties, that they overspent the federal revenues in 2009 by about $55.9 BILLION, that they are willing to spending further BILLIONS per year placating a misinformed world gone crazy over discredited "global warming", perhaps a slap on the wrist for a $15.3 million "error" is appropriate after all. But next time they need help counting inventory, I'd be willing to help for a small "finder's fee". Based on details from a CBC storyhttp://www.cbc.ca/money/story/2009/12/21/mint-missing-gold163.html?ref=rss&loomia_si=t0:a16:g2:r5:c0.103246:b29480192#socialcomments  Details...
FED: A Christmas Wish List for Taxpayers by Kevin Gaudet    Canadian Taxpayers FederationChristmas season is upon us and people all over Canada are sending Santa their wish lists. We in The Canadian Taxpayers Federation (CTF) released our wish list recently. We asked the government for a deficit action plan to balance the budget over three years. This would be a gift to taxpayers that would keep on giving as it would head off inevitable tax hikes  that will be forced upon Canadians if our federal debt grows to record levels as planned. Canada’s federal debt has once again climbed past the $500 billion mark. According to the Economist Intelligence Unit, Canada’s total public indebtedness has surpassed $1.1 trillion; ranking 22nd out of the 30 OECD countries for total public per capita indebtedness. With ramped up spending on so-called ‘stimulus’ programs in 2009-10, the federal deficit is projected to be a record $55.9 billion, or $1,651 per Canadian. By 2014-15 another $170 billion is projected to be added to the debt burden. This new debt alone will cost $10,228 per taxpayer.  Fortunately, the federal government has a spending problem, not a revenue problem. Fortunately, because it’s fairly easy to fix. Program spending has skyrocketed by almost 60 per cent in only six years. This over-spending is unsustainable and must be reined in. Given how much the government has spent in the last decade, if increased government spending created jobs, every Canadian would have two.  The federal government projects that in 2014-15 it will continue to run deficits.  Prime Minister Harper has stated he will neither raise taxes nor reduce spending in an effort to balance the budget. His approach only gets it half right, taxes need not rise. However, this do-nothing approach will saddle the nation with deficits in perpetuity. The Parliamentary Budget Office (PBO) projects that by 2013-14 the deficit will still be as high as $19 billion and that action will be required to balance the budget. Without any real plan to rein in spending, these structural deficits will remain a plague on the nation’s finances. A proactive plan to beat back the tide of red ink is needed, or else Canada may soon face a crisis as it did in the early 1990s.  It is for this reason that the CTF is calling on the federal government to implement a deficit action plan to balance the budget over three years. The CTF’s Deficit Action Plan would reduce spending modestly; by only 10 per cent from current levels, returning it to 2008-09 levels. This would amount to a net $28 billion reduction over three years. Reductions would come from the following areas: ending one-time stimulus spending; ending regional development; eliminating corporate welfare subsidies; a 30 per cent reduction in provincial equalization; a 5 per cent reduction in most departmental operating budgets; and ending and privatizing some crown corporations. Aside from these substantive reductions, political leadership also would be required. Politicians must lead by example if they are going to demand that others tighten their belts. To do this they should freeze their MP pay; reduce MP and committee travel and expense budgets; eliminate political subsidies; and, disclose in detail all MPs’ office, committee and Parliamentary Associations’ spending. Borrowing money to continue deficit spending will only burden current and future generations with leave lumps of coal through tax hikes instead of presents of tax relief. Balancing the budget can only happen with strong political will in Ottawa. Let’s hope Santa leaves some political courage under our MPs trees this Christmas. By: Kevin Gaudet Posted: December 07, 2009 Topic: Federal Contact the regional director Kevin Gaudet for further information.   Details...
Federal Debt Climbs Past Half Trillion by Kevin Gaudet   Canadian Taxpayers Federation (CTF) www.debtclock.ca Passes $500,000,000,000 Nov. 22nd at 10:56:53 p.m. Read Related news:DEBT CLIMBING TO $500B (National Post, November 18, 2009)Don Martin: Jean Chretien's half-trillion-dollar debt club gets a new member (National Post, November 18, 2009)OTTAWA: The Canadian Taxpayers Federation (CTF) held a press conference on Parliament Hill today to raise the alarm that the federal debt will climb past a half trillion dollars - $500,000,000,000.00 on Sunday, November 22nd, at 10:56:53 p.m. The size and speed of growth of the federal debt may be seen at www.debtclock.ca.CTF Federal Director, Kevin Gaudet said, “Canadians need a deficit action plan now. The mountainous debt problem amounts to fiscal child abuse as both current and future generations will have to pay it off”.After 11 years of surpluses, federal politicians have taken Canada back into deficit, projecting to add no less than $170-billion more to the debt by 2014-15.At the press conference the CTF revealed a novelty cheque from future taxpayers to the current government in the amount of $500 billion, as future taxpayers will be paying off the over-spending by the government of today. This amounts to $14,880.39 for each man, woman, and child in Canada. The federal government is currently borrowing $1,772.58 per second due to its $55.9 billion projected deficit. Since its founding in 1990, the CTF consistently has led the fight against rising debt. The first debt clock was launched in 1993 in an effort to highlight the dangers of deficit financing and the need for balanced budgets. The clock displayed the per-second increase in debt along with the share for each Canadian family. The CTF drove the debt clock across the country during its campaign against continued deficits. It was retired in 1997 when the federal government finally balanced the budget. The CTF’s new debt clock at www.debtclock.ca is built for the new web generation.  $500 billion Debt Facts: The first time the debt clock surpassed $500 billion was on August 2, 1994 at 7:27:03AM.It fell below $500 billion on October 30, 2003 at 2:47:41AM. The debt rolled into loonies lain on the ground, end-to-end, around the equator, would encircle the earth 21.2 times. A $500 billion stack of loonies would reach from the Earth to the moon, and back again, and then quarter of the way back to the moon again. A stack of hundred dollar bills lain on its side on the ground would reach all the way around the earth once and then 10% again. The debt piled as a giant stack of hundred dollar bills would build a tower as high as the CN tower ; 553m high and 15m by 30m wide. Gaudet concluded, “the CTF has been invited to meet with Finance Minister Flaherty Dec. 4th in Halifax. At the meeting the CTF will present its Deficit Action Plan to balance the federal budget.”  By: Kevin Gaudet Posted: November 18, 2009 Topic: Federal Contact the regional director Kevin Gaudet for further information.   Details...
Bay Street Shows its Power Over Ottawa by Ron Gray - Former Leader of the Christian Heritage Party Prime Minister Harper's third "economic report" was, of course, full of upbeat positive optimism. But it carefully avoided the gaping hole in the economic policies of all three of the national parties already in Parliament: the fact that money for "stimulus" is borrowed, thus plunging future generations deeper into the inescapable debt of compounding interest. Only one political party-CHP Canada-has proposed a stimulus plan that would develop needed infrastructure without plunging our children and grandchildren into debt. In fact, the Governor of the Bank of Canada, Mark Carney, has also hinted at the benefits of such a plan; but his proposal was quickly shunted aside by the federal Cabinet. Mr. Carney suggested that an unwanted rise in the Canadian dollar (which hurts our crucial exports) might best be controlled by "quantitative easing." Overnight bank interest rates are already at 0.25%; so there is little room for further downward movement. "Quantitative easing" essentially means increasing the supply of Government-Created Money (GCM) as opposed to Bank-Created Money (BCM). That is, in essence, what the CHP Infrastructure Program purposed: that money for infrastructure projects should be created by the Bank of Canada--not borrowed from the chartered banks--and loaned, virtually interest-free, to local governments and public authorities for needed infrastructure renewal. As the economy improves, those local authorities would be able to repay the loans from increased revenues. The only difference between the CHP Infrastructure Program and the Bank of Canada's "quantitative easing" is that merely increasing the money supply by printing more money--quantitative easing--would deliberately depress the value of the dollar by inflating the currency. Further, such a policy has the disastrous effect of eroding the standard of living of Canadians. Simply put, inflation drives prices up, so the wages and savings of Canadians buy less. Inflation is nothing more than a hidden tax--and a hidden tax of the worst kind because those least able to pay bear the greatest burden. The CHP Infrastructure Plan, on the other hand, would allow the Bank of Canada to do two things beneficial to Canadians and the Canadian economy. First it would allow the Bank of Canada to begin the process of getting Canada out of debt by paying back and thus retiring the BCM with all of the compounding interest attached to it. Second, as the economy responds positively to this sustainable stimulus, it allows the Bank of Canada to retire the new currency as it is repaid, allowing the Bank to control inflation, as well as the strength of the dollar. Why did the Conservative government not follow those proposals? We can only assume that they have a standing commitment to the chartered banks. That would explain why the proportion of GCM to BCM has fallen from 50% to 2% in the last half-century: the real power behind Canada's government, regardless of the party in power, is still in the hands of banks. Better solutions begin at www.chp.ca   Details...
HST and ICBC ICBC is not sure what effect the HST will have on costs to its customers. from Maureen Bader    Canadian Taxpayers FederationTo view the clip Click Here   Details...
Search
Events Calendar
< February >
S M T W T F S
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 1 2 3 4 5 6


Climate Change Info
Global Warming Petition Project (Over 31,000 scientists have signed as of June 2008)

Global Warming Doomsday Called Off---CBC Documentary

Ontario Government Distributes Al Gore Climate Change Film to Schools

"Deniers" Series Exposes Poor Science Behind Global Warming

Abortion Linked to Climate Change
BC: HST on Parking Tax - Hosed Again

by Maureen Bader    Canadian Taxpayers Federation

People have lots reasons to be upset about the Harmonized Sales Tax (HST). For starters, it means the price of many goods and services will be 7 per cent higher. Of course, the government assures us this will only be at first. They claim businesses will pass cost savings along to consumers because they will no longer pay the provincial sales tax (PST) on their business inputs. Many citizens are skeptical about whether businesses will lower prices. However, what citizens should really be skeptical about is whether the prices for services the government provides will go down. So far it seems it will be government, not business, ripping-off consumers.

One example is the PST on liquor in restaurants, which will fall from 10 to 7 per cent. Will this mean a price reduction to hard-pressed consumers? No, the government will increase the wholesale mark-up on alcohol to keep its revenue the same. So tipplers will see no savings when the HST arrives -- no harmonization-induced price reduction here, folks.

Taxpayers were also supposed to say goodbye to the 7 per cent parking sales tax that goes to TransLink, the Lower Mainland's public transit Leviathan. The government said that tax would be repealed with the implementation of the HST, and "options for TransLink related to the removal of the parking tax are being reviewed."

That not only led the naïve observer, but TransLink Chair Dale Parker to muse about what TransLink would do once it no longer had the 7 per cent parking sales tax to count on for revenue.

So imagine the shock and awe when the Ministry of Finance announced in December that the PST on parking in TransLink’s region would triple from 7 per cent to 21 per cent. 

But, wait a minute! Wasn't the PST on parking supposed to be eliminated? Oh no, explained the finance ministry. The PST on parking isn't really a PST (even though it’s covered in the Social Services Tax Act, otherwise known as the PST legislation), it’s a tax collected by the province for TransLink, so it doesn't fall into the PST cuts originally announced, even though they in fact, did announce it. 

If you are not already a bit befuddled by this, hold on to your wallet. According to federal GST legislation, if a sales tax in B.C. is more than 11 per cent, the 12 per cent HST will be charged on top of it. That means the parking sales tax will not be 21 per cent as originally announced, but 23.52 per cent as of July 1, 2010. Paying HST on a tax? Can you say tax grab? 

But not only will working stiffs and shoppers trying to park in the Lower Mainland pay HST on the parking sales tax, they will pay HST on parking as well, bumping up the total tax paid on parking to 35.52 per cent! 

Theory says that consumer prices should go down once the HST is implemented. Experience tells that when government gets involved, prices go up. The government says it is bringing in the HST to lower costs and make the province more competitive for business investment. But forgetting facts when they are no longer convenient and arbitrarily increasing a tax is the mark of a government out of control. The government must stick with original plan and repeal the TransLink parking tax.

By: Maureen Bader
Posted: January 11, 2010
 
Read more...
 
Hundreds of Thousands Join 37th March for Life
Downstream Media Under-reports ProLife Numbers (Again)

By John-Henry Westen      LifeSiteNews.com 

WASHINGTON, January 23, 2010 - Weather reports in the days leading up to Friday’s March for Life warned of rain and snow; however, spirits were high and the weather good on the day of the event, with no snow or rain falling and temperatures remaining bearable.  A sea of youth dominated the massive crowd, one of the largest – if not the largest - in the history of the 37 years of the annual March for Life.

Organizer Nellie Gray told the press that the numbers of marchers this year far exceeded last year, which was estimated at well over 300,000.  That sentiment was echoed by many long-time March for Life participants.

The morning prior to the March was filled with activities around the D.C. area, with tens of thousands in attendance at major events.  The Verizon Centre was filled to capacity for the official 11 a.m. Mass. 

A Human Life International (HLI) ‘mini’-conference also was well attended. The world’s largest pro-life organization packed their hotel conference room, treating guests to bagels and coffee and the experiences of HLI leaders from around the globe.  A short address by this reporter and a final talk by HLI President Fr. Tom Euteneuer concluded the event, after which participants joined the hundreds of thousands gathering for the march.

All along the route hundreds of banners from high schools, colleges, religious orders, and pro-life groups, could be seen leading their companies, with several marching bands keeping a lively cadence throughout the throng.

 

While pro-lifers marched by the hundreds of thousands, less than a dozen pro-abortion supporters stood before the Supreme Court with signs. Reading the CNN coverage, however, one would be led to believe the numbers were equal.

NPR similarly understated to an extreme degree the disparity between the pro-life and pro-abortion forces, admitting only that there were a “smaller number of pro-choice demonstrators.”  Notably missing was the fact that the pro-abortion demonstrators were outnumbered about 20,000 to 1, or more.

The Washington Post was more accurate, but still off by a factor of at least 10.  “Tens of thousands of abortion opponents marched through the cold Friday in the annual March for Life,” reported the Post, adding, “Few counter-demonstrators were visible along the route, but some gathered in front of the Supreme Court.”

USA Today gave a feel for the massive pro-life presence at the March reporting that “120 buses of abortion protesters from southwestern Pennsylvania” alone took part.

Even in the midst of such extreme bias from the mainstream media, however, it was easy to pinpoint the most outlandish report – from Newsweek.  The report by Krista Gesaman suggested that what was missing from the march were young women.

But far from missing, young women were in fact the dominant demographic at this 37th March for Life.

Congressman Chris Smith addressed the marchers prior to the commencement of the event, pointing to what he believes is the motivation for this year’s massive turnout.  He noted that “with healthcare plans trying to begin using taxpayer dollars fund abortions for the first time since the 1970s via forcing insurance coverage, the U.S. is looking at the single greatest expansion of abortion since the tragic Roe v Wade court ruling 37 years ago.”

Smith pointed out that in his first year in office, President Obama has moved swiftly to: allow the use of U.S. taxpayers money to fund abortion groups all over the word by rescinding the Mexico City Policy; enable China’s coercive population control program by funding the United Nations Population Fund; and roll back restrictions on funding for human embryo-destroying stem cell experimentation. Obama is also in the process of altering federal regulations to roll back the nation’s existing conscience protection laws that protect the rights and freedoms of healthcare providers (such as Catholic hospitals, physicians and nurses) who are opposed to performing abortions on personal or moral grounds.

However, Smith went on to say, embodying the spirit of the pro-life movement: "President Obama — the abortion president — should know this: even though you have unleashed the full might and power of your administration in the ignoble promotion of abortion on demand both in the United States and around the world, especially in Africa and Latin America, we do pray and fast for you, even as we tenaciously fight your anti-life policies.”

Read more...
 
Skeena-Bulkley Valley CHP Youth Caucus Receives Award from Party Leader
The Skeena-Bulkley Valley Youth Caucus received a plaque and a letter of commendation and thanks from Party Leader Jim Hnatiuk for their help in fund-raising during his by-election campaign in 2009. Local youth participated in the fund-raising drive and raised more than $2000 for his campaign. Marissa Duursma won a gift certificate from Hero's Lighthouse for her exceptional efforts in soliciting funds. The CHP relies completely on voluntary donations from its members and supporters, unlike the Conservatives, Liberals, NDP, Bloc Quebecois and the Greens. Those parties receive annual taxpayer-funded subsidies amounting to $30 MILLION ! Local candidate Rod Taylor and EDA board members Theo Stad and Nancy Duursma were also on hand to offer their thanks for the good job done by these young people.


The CHP Youth Caucus met to plan events for the Spring and to discuss current issues, including the proposed HST.



Read more...
 
Calgary Church Loses Charity Status: Opposition to Abortion, Homosexuality Cited as Reasons
By Patrick B. Craine         LifeSiteNews.com

CALGARY, Alberta, January 21, 2010 - The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) has revoked the charitable status of Kings Glory Fellowship (KGF), a Christian church in Calgary.  CRA cites a number of issues with KGF's application, but the decision is based, in part, on the ground that certain KGF Board members have spoken out strongly against abortion, and other moral issues.

"The members of the Board of Directors espouse strong negative views about sensitive and controversial issues, which may also be viewed as political, such as abortion, homosexuality, divorce, etc.,” wrote CRA agent Dian Prodanov in an October 29th letter.

These “political” views make the church ineligible because, according to the agent, a registered charity “may only engage in non-partisan political activities as long as it devotes substantially all (usually 90% or more) of its resources to charitable activities."

KGF's pastor, Artur Pawlowski, is also the founder and pastor of Street Church Ministries, which has made headlines because of its battle with the city of Calgary to uphold its right to preach to and serve the city's poor.

In December, a provincial court judge sided with Pawlowski and SCM, striking down several city infractions against them.  Further, the judge found that "the City's attempts ... to limit the scope of the efforts by the accused to minister to his congregants, fall precariously close to being excessive and, to any reasonable observer, an abuse of power."

Prodanov cited numerous problems with KGF's application, such as a lack of detail about various expenditures, but Pawlowski called these other reasons “smoke screens.”

“The main point is that they don't like my opinions about different controversial issues, and I speak about them openly on radio, in paper, and on TV,” he said.  “So that's what happens when you express your views as a pastor.”

“If they take the charity status away from a church, they are hoping that they are going to starve us to death in Canada, and therefore we will not be able to influence anyone,” he continued.  “That's basically what happens.  That's what they want to accomplish.  They want to muzzle us up.”


Contact Information:

Prime Minister Stephen Harper
80 Wellington Street
Ottawa K1A 0A2
Fax: 613-941-6900
E-mail: This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it

Hon. Keith Ashfield
Minister of National Revenue
7th Floor
555 MacKenzie Avenue
Ottawa ON  K1A 0L5
Phone: (613) 992-1067
Fax: (613) 996-9955
E-mail: This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it

Read more...
 
FED: Audit Nightmare

by Kevin Gaudet Canadian Taxpayers Federation

Imagine the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) shows up at your door to do an audit.  As if that alone isn’t scary enough, they proceed to take both copies of your documents, originals and photocopies  -- without your permission.  They lose or destroy these key originals. Then they assess hefty tax bills against you because you cannot provide documents in your defense.  CRA mistakenly demands you pay $800,000 in taxes allegedly owed.  This helps ruin your business, leaving you broke. Does this sound far-fetched?  Not according to British Columbia’s Mr. Irvin Leroux, who has lost everything fighting for 14 years against such bully tactics by the CRA.

His treatment outraged his MP, the long-serving Dick Harris, who took up his cause with the former Minister of National Revenue. According to Mr. Leroux, his MP was told by the Minister that the CRA couldn’t pro-actively compensate Mr. Leroux for his loss, but that he could sue the government and they would offer a settlement.

As ridiculous as it is that Mr. Leroux has been forced to sue the Canadian government to get back some or all of what he has lost in his lengthy tax fight fiasco, not a nickel has been offered. In this case it appears the federal government made a mistake; a big one at that. They should just admit it, apologize for it, and settle out of court with Mr. Leroux. Instead, they are playing the Goliath against his David, fighting him in court and denying any wrong-doing on their part.

The latest tactic employed by government lawyers, scheduled for court at the end of this January, has been to argue that Leroux’s lawsuit has no merit as his tax case was resolved earlier. 

Read more...
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Results 1 - 10 of 496
Map of Skeena-Bulkley
How a Bill Becomes Law
This video tutorial produced by ARPA Canada details the process by which an idea is transformed into a bill and how that bill becomes law.
Most Recent Articles
Recommended Links
CHP YOUTH !







The newest and fastest-growing branch of the CHP in Canada----the Skeena-Bulkley Valley CHP Youth Caucus----is drawing attention across the country as young people in Northern BC are pouring their energy and enthusiasm into practical efforts to transform society!

The group has had several fundraisers and is reaching out to young people across the riding who have a heart for righteousness and a willingness to roll up their sleeves to see Canada lead the world with sound family values, a respect for human life and the personal freedoms we all cherish.

To join or find out more about the SBV Youth, send an email to:
This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it
Syndicate
© 2010 Christian Heritage Party
.